Construction Company Case Study: $106K Monthly MCA Payments Reduced to $40K
A Strategic Case Study by Federal National Funding Capital Group
Introduction: When Construction Growth Turns Into Cash Flow Pressure
In 2026, construction companies are scaling faster than ever:
Larger contracts
Higher revenue volume
Expanding crews and operations
But with that growth comes a hidden risk:
Over-reliance on Merchant Cash Advances (MCAs)
This case study highlights a real-world scenario where a construction company:
Faced $106,000 per month in MCA payments
Was experiencing severe cash flow pressure
Was approaching default and operational instability
And how we helped them:
Reduce payments to $40,000/month
Eliminate daily withdrawals
Restore financial control
This case study follows our proven framework:
MCA Default
→ Capital Restructuring
→ Asset Preservation
→ Commercial Real Estate Workout
→ Confidential Consultation
MCA DEFAULT: The Breaking Point for Construction Companies
The Situation
Industry: Construction / Contracting
Monthly Revenue: $750,000
Total MCA Debt: $1.1MM
Monthly MCA Payments: $106,000
Daily Withdrawals: $5,000+
The Problem
Cash flow was consistently tight
Payroll cycles were stressed
Vendor payments were delayed
The Risk
UCC liens across multiple lenders
Increased collection pressure
Potential legal escalation
Recommended Reading:
MCA Debt Crisis: Consolidation, Default & Restructuring Strategies for Business
Behind on MCA Payments in 2026? Best Consolidation Options to Stop the Pressure Fast
Key Insight:
Construction companies don’t fail from lack of work—they fail from cash flow misalignment
CAPITAL RESTRUCTURING: The $106K → $40K Solution
The objective was clear:
Reduce payment burden
Eliminate daily withdrawals
Stabilize operations
Core Solution:
The Strategy
Step 1: Debt Mapping
All MCA positions identified
Payment schedules analyzed
Total burden calculated
Step 2: Custom Consolidation Structure
A structured facility was designed to:
Pay off multiple MCA lenders
Replace daily withdrawals
Align payments with revenue
Step 3: Execution
Coordinated lender payoffs
Negotiated positions
Transitioned to new structure
BEFORE vs AFTER
BEFORE:
$106,000/month MCA payments
Daily ACH withdrawals
Multiple lenders
AFTER:
$40,000/month structured payment
No daily withdrawals
One consolidated facility
RESULTS:
62% payment reduction
Immediate cash flow relief
Operational stability restored
Key Insight:
The turning point wasn’t more jobs—it was restructuring the debt
ASSET PRESERVATION: Protecting the Business
Before restructuring, the company considered:
Selling equipment
Cutting crews
Delaying projects
Strategic Preservation
Through distressed debt solutions, we preserved:
Equipment and operational capacity
Workforce stability
Revenue-generating projects
Advanced Strategies Include:
Sell assets before foreclosure (strategically)
Avoid bankruptcy auction scenarios
Structured lender negotiations
Maintain operational continuity
Complex Considerations:
Bankruptcy restructuring
Chapter 11 asset sales
Distressed asset repositioning
Avoided due to successful restructuring
Key Insight:
Preserving operations is critical in construction—once lost, recovery is difficult
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE WORKOUT: Leveraging Hidden Value
The company owned:
Yard and warehouse property
Strategic Opportunity
We explored:
Cash-out refinance
Bridge loan
Equity extraction
Commercial Real Estate:
FNF Capital Group Announces Commercial Real Estate Financing Programs up to $500 Million
Advanced Applications:
Distressed commercial real estate restructuring
Distressed multifamily refinancing
Multifamily workout solutions
Bankruptcy real estate sales
Avoid foreclosure through structured exits
Key Insight:
Real estate often provides a secondary path to full debt resolution
TRANSITION TO LONG-TERM CAPITAL
After stabilization, the company transitioned into:
Benefits Achieved:
Predictable monthly payments
Improved liquidity
Ability to bid on larger projects
Financial stability
Related Articles:
MCA Debt Crisis: Consolidation, Default & Restructuring Strategies for Business
Behind on MCA Payments in 2026? Best Consolidation Options to Stop the Pressure Fast
CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION: The Turning Point
The company acted before default.
That made all the difference.
Timing Impact
Early Action:
Better terms
More options
Faster execution
Delayed Action:
Legal escalation
UCC enforcement
Reduced flexibility
Reality:
Acting early preserved both the business and its growth trajectory
FAQ SECTION
Can construction companies consolidate MCA debt?
Yes—construction companies are strong candidates due to revenue volume and contracts.
How much can payments be reduced?
Typically 50–80%. In this case: ~62%.
Can daily payments be eliminated?
Yes—replaced with structured monthly payments.
What if multiple MCA lenders are involved?
This is common—consolidation resolves stacked debt.
Is bankruptcy required?
No—most cases are resolved without bankruptcy.
Final Takeaway
This construction company didn’t fail—they were overleveraged.
And with the right structure:
Payments reduced from $106K → $40K
Daily withdrawals eliminated
Business stabilized
The difference between pressure and control is structure
MCA Consolidation Program with Savings Up to 80% – Request Your Free Consultation Here
✔ Soft Credit Pull • ✔ No Obligation • ✔ Nationwide Programs Available
Call: 1-800-774-3056
Speak with an MCA Consolidation Advisor today.